Profeval Logo



General Information
Professor: Kathryn Mincey
Course: ENG 220
Course Title: Approaches To Literature
Student Grade: A
Post Date: 10:24:17 AM 5/8/2003
Overall Rating: Poor Poor
Options
[ Previous Evaluation ] [ Next Evaluation ]  
[ Back to List ]
[ New Search ] Professor: Mincey
[ New Search ] Course: ENG 220

 

Evaluate This Professor

Exam Information
Exam Content: No Multiple Choice
Yes Matching
No True/False
No Fill in the Blank
Yes Essay
No Problem Solving
Mandatory Final: Yes
Cumulative Final: No
Other Information
Textbook Required: Yes
Extra Credit Available: Yes
Attendance Required: Yes
Quantity of Notes: Overkill
Difficulty: Difficult
Additional Comments
This class was the hardest class I have taken since I have been at Morehead State University. I didnt like the fact that there was soo much work for the level of class. The teacher seemed to have something against me because everytime I would turn something in she would have to criticize it. Also, the fact that we only had 2 tests was really hard because you had to know all this information for one test and it made it very difficult to pass. It was like the professor was out to make the students not to pass. I also feel that the professor was not fair to all the students in the class because upon giving an answer to a question she would criticize me and no matter how wrong or off the other students were they were always right and that is so wrong of her to do. I will never take a class under this professor again.
Professor's Comment (05/08/2003):
"There were two students in this section who were warned about plagiarism early in the course (turning in identical responses to out-of-class writings) and then chose to plagiarize their take-home final from sources on the web. As you can tell by reading these two adjacent "poor" evaluations (posted at nearly the same time), they seem to be even mimicking each other in their postings. I heard several of these same observations in conference with one of the aforementioned students, who apparently does the writing for the pair. Ironically, instead of failing them for plagiarism, I gave them another chance to do their own work. If, in fact, these two evaluations came from the students I suspect, they were submitted (according to the time) after I invited them in for a conference about their plagiarism and before they found out that I would not automatically fail them but give them another chance. The degree of credibility of the writers is demonstrated by the fact that they both claim to have an "A" in the class but complain that the class is too difficult to pass and the instructor too critical of their work."  



Abuse/Correction Report
! If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button.
 


Tell a Friend | Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Copyright © 2000 - 2011 Profeval v12.11.25 b192