Profeval Logo



General Information
Professor: Kathryn Mincey
Course: ENG 220
Course Title: Approaches To Literature
Student Grade: A
Post Date: 10:23:54 AM 5/8/2003
Overall Rating: Poor Poor
Options
[ Previous Evaluation ] [ Next Evaluation ]  
[ Back to List ]
[ New Search ] Professor: Mincey
[ New Search ] Course: ENG 220

 

Evaluate This Professor

Exam Information
Exam Content: No Multiple Choice
Yes Matching
No True/False
No Fill in the Blank
Yes Essay
No Problem Solving
Mandatory Final: Yes
Cumulative Final: No
Other Information
Textbook Required: Yes
Extra Credit Available: Yes
Attendance Required: Yes
Quantity of Notes: Overkill
Difficulty: Difficult
Additional Comments
This class sucked. I felt that there was way to much reading involved and that the reading was not really explained so that I could understand. I do not feel the professor was helpful at all. I will never take a course under this professor again. This professor did help me realize that I did not want to return to this school again next year. I felt like I was an outsider in the class and the professor did nothing but contribute to that fact. When I did participate in class I felt as though my answeres were not good enough to have even been said where as when my fellow classmates gave an answer no matter how wrong it was their answers were always well recieved. I felt as though this class was on of the worst experiences in my history at this university.
Professor's Comment (05/08/2003):
"There were two students in this section who were warned about plagiarism early in the course (turning in identical responses to out-of-class writings) and then chose to plagiarize their take-home final from sources on the web. As you can tell by reading these two adjacent "poor" evaluations (posted at nearly the same time), they seem to be even mimicking each other in their postings. I heard several of these same observations in conference with one of the aforementioned students, who apparently does the writing for the pair. Ironically, instead of failing them for plagiarism, I gave them another chance to do their own work. If, in fact, these two evaluations came from the students I suspect, they were submitted (according to the time) after I invited them in for a conference about their plagiarism and before they found out that I would not automatically fail them but give them another chance. The degree of credibility of the writers is demonstrated by the fact that they both claim to have an "A" in the class but complain that the class is too difficult to pass and the instructor too critical of their work."  



Abuse/Correction Report
! If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button.
 


Tell a Friend | Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Copyright © 2000 - 2011 Profeval v12.11.25 b192