| General Information |
| Professor: |
Harold Dexter |
| Course: |
EDU 250 |
| Course Title: |
Intro To Teaching Education |
| Student Grade: |
A |
| Post Date: |
1:30:20 PM 12/19/2003 |
| Overall Rating: |
Poor  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
 Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Yes |
| Cumulative Final: |
No |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
No |
| Attendance Required: |
No |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Few/None |
| Difficulty: |
Moderate |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
Although I will agree with previous students that Mr. Dexter is a very nice man and terribly concerned for his students, he is not a good teacher. He will go out of his way to do almost anything for a student. He makes an attempt to get to really know everyone. But he does not teach the class effectively. As for notes, he copies them straight from the book, so you do not have to take notes if you do not feel like it. I do not consider myself a close-minded person; I just believe that he could have done a much better job teaching. I do not feel as if I got anything from his teaching. If it had not been for my field experience, I would have changed my major. For these reasons, I believe that he is a poor teacher. Not because of his or my prejudice to anyone. All Edu 250 classes may be this way, and if they are, then I pity all teaching education majors. But I have heard from others that they were allowed to discuss teaching concerns, experiences, and "what-if" situations-things I feel to be more important than Dexter's month long discussion of different teacher organizations. I just felt that WKU's teaching program should be more serious and informative than this, as well as teachers setting good examples.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
