| General Information |
| Professor: |
Katie Algeo |
| Course: |
GEOG 101 |
| Course Title: |
Human Geography |
| Student Grade: |
B |
| Post Date: |
4:30:18 PM 5/3/2004 |
| Overall Rating: |
Poor  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
 Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Yes |
| Cumulative Final: |
No |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
Yes |
| Attendance Required: |
Yes |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Overkill |
| Difficulty: |
Difficult |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
This class is awful. If you have an opportunity to take Katie Algeo I reccommend that you burn every hair folicle on your body, so you can get somewhat of an idea the pain she will cause you. Her first test was awful, the class average was like a 61. one of the questions was "On a polynesian stick chart, shells represent blank". It was on one of the first few pages of the book and she said we wouldn't have to study that part. You don't know what to study for on the tests because she won't tell you what's important and what' not. We talked about the Amish for 2 days and never had a single question on the test. The projects are kind of hard, but the reason this class sucks isn't because of those. The reason the notes are overkill is because she doesn't test you on what's on the overhead, but also the things she talks about in great detail. She's very picky and her class is more frustrating than Christopher Reeve trying to do the hokey pokey. Not to knock Christopher Reeve, but I hope this gives you an idea of how bad this class is.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
