| General Information |
| Professor: |
Carl Pierce |
| Course: |
LAW |
| Course Title: |
Legal Profession |
| Student Grade: |
Not Specified |
| Post Date: |
9:01:22 PM 4/28/2006 |
| Overall Rating: |
Poor  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
 Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Yes |
| Cumulative Final: |
Yes |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
No |
| Attendance Required: |
Not Specified |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Overkill |
| Difficulty: |
Moderate |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
The problem with this course is that Pierce is mind-numbingly boring. He's the absolute nicest man in the world, however. The readings are extremely long and dull, but having to listen to the crazy rendition of the assignment in class is even worse. By the end of the semester, you are not entirely sure what happened in the class and you will be teaching yourself the ethics rules. What makes it worse is that you have to know this stuff for the bar, and Pierce isn't going to teach it to you. Avoid at all costs.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
